Contrasting Regional Economic Geographies
Between the 1840s and the 1930s, strikingly different economic geographies emerged behind two powerful gateway cities in Asia. By the mid nineteenth century, Bombay had established itself as a thriving colonial and imperial stronghold. Yet across its vast hinterland, equally significant transformations were unfolding. Ahmedabad, a renowned financial and commercial centre, developed into one of the most important textile manufacturing cities in the subcontinent in less than half a century, earning the title of ‘the Manchester of India’. Across the Deccan, Sholapur evolved from a cotton trading town into a major industrial hub, while Nagpur gained prominence following Jamsetji Nusserwanji Tata’s decision to establish the Empress Mills there in the 1870s. Notably, the industrial trajectories of Ahmedabad, Sholapur, Nagpur, and numerous smaller urban centres were often only loosely tied to Bombay. Rather than emanating from the port city, they were frequently shaped by entrepreneurial initiatives, investment flows, and business networks that extended across western India and, in some cases, the wider subcontinent. Although Bombay remained western India’s largest and most prestigious metropolis, it did not command the economic life of its hinterland. Instead, the region witnessed a multicentric and comparatively less port city-centred pattern of industrial and urban growth.
Continue reading Rethinking Globalization and Regional Development behind Global Port Cities